Browser & Mobile Use Over Time

With the announcement yesterday that Microsoft will not be supporting IE 8-10 in the very near future, I thought I would check our repository and digital collection to see what browsers are being used. I had meant to do this for some time after seeing another place had higher mobile use than Firefox use.

I decided to compare the month of December over several years to see changes

First up, our institutional repository (Digital Commons software)

Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
IE 53% 42% 33% 25% 17% 15% 11%
Chrome 4% 11% 20% 30% 40% 46% 50%
Firefox 32% 31% 31% 25% 22% 19% 16%
Safari 9% 12% 12% 16% 15% 15% 16%
Other 2% 3% 3% 4% 7% 4% 6%
desktop 100% 98% 97% 94% 90% 87% 84%
mobile 2% 2% 3% 6% 9% 12%
tablet 1% 3% 4% 4% 4%

A few comments:

  • I use Firefox for my IR work and I am in it every day.
  • The repository is primarily PDFs. Given how lousy PDFs are on a small mobile device, I am actually surprised at how large the mobile number is.
  • Use going directly to a PDF from Google (or other source) is not counted (so the totals would be low), but the percentages are hopefully about right.

The specific use of IE products is:

Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
     IE 11.0 9% 52% 72%
     IE 10.0 1% 27% 14% 9%
     IE 9.0 1% 28% 53% 27% 15% 6%
     IE 8.0 32% 70% 54% 34% 30% 13% 6%
     IE 7.0 51% 22% 14% 10% 6% 5% 7%
     IE 6.0 17% 8% 4% 1% 1%
  • Note that IE % of use increased in 2015! (The actual number of sessions increased from 107 to 146, so it isn’t just a percentage thing.) I am sure this relates to the overall Libraries website use (see below) by various browsers.

Our digital collections are in CONTENTdm software.

Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
IE 60% 46% 43% 33% 24% 22% 16%
Chrome 3% 9% 15% 20% 29% 37% 45%
Firefox 26% 32% 23% 20% 20% 16% 13%
Safari 9% 12% 16% 20% 19% 20% 22%
Other 3% 1% 4% 7% 9% 5% 4%
desktop 99% 98% 94% 86% 85% 76% 73%
mobile 1% 2% 4% 8% 8% 16% 18%
tablet 2% 6% 7% 8% 9%
  • Again, I typically use Firefox, as does my colleague who manages our digital collections.
  • I find the site quite horrible on a mobile device and am actually surprised by the high usage
  • We are currently have issues with some of our videos playing in anything but Chrome, so were pleased to see it was used the most.

IE details:

Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
     IE 11.0 14% 64% 81%
     IE 10.0 1% 34% 10% 8%
     IE 9.0 1% 33% 57% 27% 16% 6%
     IE 8.0 38% 75% 51% 35% 23% 8% 3%
     IE 7.0 49% 20% 14% 6% 3% 3% 2%
     IE 6.0 13% 4% 1% 1%

This is the pattern I expected to see in all three cases.

Finally, I checked the Libraries website as a comparison. I am not sure how many computers have the libraries website up by default; we have a few walk-in user stations that are restricted to the libraries website and the one I checked uses IE.

Libs Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
IE 58% 49% 44% 39% 37% 33% 27%
Chrome 2% 7% 11% 15% 25% 32% 38%
Firefox 23% 24% 18% 17% 17% 15% 13%
Safari 16% 20% 24% 25% 17% 18% 19%
Other 1% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 2%
desktop 100% 99% 95% 93% 91% 90% 89%
mobile 1% 4% 5% 6% 7% 9%
tablet 1% 2% 3% 3% 3%

Note that the mobile usage for the libraries website as a whole is lower than for our repository or digital collections! I think this must have something to do with staff and with the walk up terminals.

The IE versions used on the Libraries website is where it get weird

Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
     IE 11.0 3% 29% 43%
     IE 10.0 1% 26% 9% 2%
     IE 9.0 27% 39% 11% 6% 3%
     IE 8.0 43% 76% 60% 51% 52% 41% 1%
     IE 7.0 52% 21% 11% 9% 8% 15% 51%
     IE 6.0 5% 3% 1%

Look at that use for IE 7.0! What is up with that? The actual number of sessions INCREASED from 4,945 to 11,358 from December 2014 to December 2015. I checked, and almost all of our IE 7.0 use comes from on campus.

Addendum:

It looks like one of the major sources of IE 7.0 use above are the walk in user/express stations which are set to find/infohawk.  About 60% of the landing pages for IE 7.0 are to the find/infohawk page (and virtually all of the usage of that page comes from IE 7.0), and Hardin (our medical library) gets another 23% of the use.  Last January, the find/infohawk page was not used by IE 7.0 (I don’t know if it is a new page that didn’t exist a year ago). The find/infohawk page starts appearing in the IE 7.0 session landing pages in April, with the numbers comparable to now in May.

Advertisements

Collection Use, Tumblr & Google Analytics Puzzles

We have a great crowdsourced transcriptions site1 that has received a lot of publicity lately which corresponds to some significant usage peaks. This image from our Google Analytics shows use from 14 September 2014–13 November 2014.

2 months of diyhistory usage

The first peak (3,654) on 2 October corresponds to a BuzzFeed post on 1 October. I am uncertain about the 26 October small peak of 507. It appears to be from Facebook. The 5 November peak of 911 is due to  beatonna’s “Hark! A Vagrant” Tumblr post and the 11 November peak of 1,923 is thanks to John Green’s Tumblr post. (The 16 October 2014 NBC news article did not bump our usage.) However, looking at Google Analytics to see the source for our traffic during this same period shows surprisingly low numbers from both beatonna.tumblr.com and fishingboatproceeds.tumblr.com (the two blogs which we know caused the spikes). In addition, the number of direct users also seems high.

diyhistory source statistics

In fact, if we were to just look at our social usage (8,185 sessions of 23,313, or 35% of all our usage), we would not think Tumblr was that important in directing people to our content. And yet we know those spikes correspond to our site appearing on two extremely popular Tumblr blogs.

diyhistory-social

We thought perhaps using a Tumblr app on a mobile device would result in what appears to be a direct link. The mobile use of the site is fairly substantial.

diyhistory-mobile

However, looking specifically at November 5–12 (the time period of the two peaks presumably from Tumblr), there is actually a higher percentage (82.55%) of desktop usage than for the month as a whole.

I need to explain the dashboard for those of you that don’t use Tumblr. You can link to a Tumblr post directly, which works well for cross-posting to Twitter or Facebook (and is the way people who are not active on Tumblr typically see posts). These URLs can be seen in our source data above. However, if you have a Tumblr account and follow various blogs, you will typically see content in the Tumblr dashboard (http://www.tumblr.com/dashboard). This domain does not appear as a source in our Google Analytics data.

tumblr-dashboard

Thursday evening I conducted tests going from Tumblr to our digital collections. I am using our Iowa City Past Tumblr and our CONTENTdm collections for testing because I could more easily isolate use. These are the items I went to in our collection and where I started the use.

I expected the use from the Tumblr apps to be counted as direct in Google Analytics. Given our lack of Tumblr data for our other site, I thought the Tumblr dashboard might also be counted as direct. What I found simply puzzled me.

The following shows the Google Analytics data for 13 November 2014 of the specific landing pages I tested. The first item (which shows use from Tumblr) was not part of my specific testing. The other four lines were all tests coming from Tumblr.

Landing Page Source / Medium Sessions Pages / Session Hour
/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/978 iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral 1 2.00 16
/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/978 l.facebook.com / referral 1 7.00 17
/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/15296 iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral 1 5.00 18
/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/18031 pinterest.com / referral 1 5.00 18
/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/9634 (direct) / (none) 1 5.00 18

My Android tablet test using the Tumblr app is the only one that correctly shows I came from Tumblr. So, not only is our Tumblr use under reported, in this case the Facebook and Pinterest use is over counted!

This is the social data for the ictcs collection on 13 November 2014.

2014-11-13-social

Specifically, the Tumblr use is:

Shared URL Hour Sessions Pageviews Source / Medium
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/13545 14 1(14.29%) 6(15.00%) tweitzelposts.tumblr.com / referral
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/search/collection/ictcs/searchterm/Photocollages%20(Photographic%20compositions)/field/typa/mode/exact/conn/and/display/200/order/title/ad/asc 15 1(14.29%) 1(2.50%) iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/978 16 1(14.29%) 2(5.00%) iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/search/collection/wwiid 17 1(14.29%) 2(5.00%) iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ictcs/id/15296 18 1(14.29%) 5(12.50%) iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/ictcs/ 18 1(14.29%) 22(55.00%) iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral
digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/search/collection/ictcs/searchterm/Military/field/all/mode/all/conn/and/order/title 19 1(14.29%) 2(5.00%) iowacitypast.tumblr.com / referral

We have Google Analytics code in our Tumblr blog, but we do not receive data from people viewing our content through the Tumblr dashboard. We only show 11 sessions for our Tumblr blog on 13 November, two of which came from Twitter, three from Google, six direct and none using mobile devices. Only one of the pages I used for a test appears as a landing page (which means the use is attributable to someone else). Essentially, this data is useful to see how people who are not regular Tumblr users see your content, but it misses the active Tumblr community.

Edited to add:

It occurred to me that the situation is akin to Google Analytics only showing Facebook as the source when people link from a public Facebook page and not when they link to content they find in their news feed.

1 I should have originally made it more clear that the “we” in the first word of the post refers to my fantastic colleagues and that I have not been part of the project, other than to cheer them on.